AS A RESULT OF THE LAW, DIFFERENCES IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ARRANGEMENTS IN POLICE REGULATION NUMBER 8 OF 2021

Authors

  • Nugraha Pranadita Langlang Buana University, Bandung

Keywords:

Law, Justice Restorative, Law Enforcement, Criminal

Abstract

The aim of law enforcement in Indonesia is For reach justice that is useful and provides legal certainty for public. Efforts to reach matter that, keep going attempted by the authorities law enforcement, among others is republican state police Indonesia and the prosecutor's office Republic of Indonesia, where second agency This constitute guard gate in law enforcement. In an attempt law enforcement, often apparatus law enforcement confronted to contradictory situation between regulation existing legislation. There is moreover previously with existing culture become habit public in finish something problem, where? public more prioritize the deliberation process For reach consensus in finish it . Identification problem study This is : How? due to the law of difference room scope arrangement justice restorative according to perpol number 8 of 2021 towards criminal law enforcement ? Study This use method Normative legal research and uses approach descriptive analytical with purpose For describe and analyze positive legal provisions related to justice restorative, Normative legal research using secondary data later categorized become primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials , then the data analyzed in a way juridical qualitative. Result of study This is that kinds and types follow possible punishment resolved through implementation justice restorative in level police more Lots or more wide compared to at level attorney. Second, that condition formal implementation justice restorative in level attorney more rigid compared to at level police.

References

Afthonul Afif, Forgiveness, Reconciliation and restorative justice, Discourse on past violations and efforts to overcome them , Student Library, Jakarta, 2015 .

Amir Ilyas , Collection of legal principles , RajaGrafindo perkasa, Jakarta, 2020 .

Anas Yusuf, Implementation of Restorative Justice in Law Enforcement by the National Police , Trisakti University, Jakarta, 2016 .

Bambang Waluyo, Design of the Prosecutor's Function in Restorative Justice , Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2017 .

Basuki Rekso Wibowo, State of legal certainty, justice and legal benefits in the Indonesian criminal justice system , Pustaka reka copyright, Bandung, 2020 .

Ismu Gunadi and Jonaedi Efendi, Criminal Law , Kencana, Jakarta, 2014 .

Jonlar Purba, Law enforcement against lightly motivated criminal acts with restorative justice , Jala Permata Aksara, Jakarta, 2017 .

Luthfi J. Kurniawan, et al, Welfare state and social services , Intrans Publishing, Malang, 2015 .

Otje Salman S, Legal Philosophy, Development and dynamics of problems , Refika Aditama, Jakarta, 2018

Regulation attorney Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 Concerning Termination Prosecution Based on Justice Restorative .

Regulation Republic of Indonesia State Police Number 8 of 2021 Concerning Handling Act Criminal Based on Justice Restorative .

Soerjono soekamnto, Normative Legal Research , Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2006 .

Constitution Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002 Concerning National Police of the Republic of Indonesia.

Constitution Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2004 Concerning attorney Republic of Indonesia.

Constitution Number 17 of 2007 Concerning National Long Term Development Plan 2005-2025.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-25

How to Cite

Pranadita, N. (2024). AS A RESULT OF THE LAW, DIFFERENCES IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ARRANGEMENTS IN POLICE REGULATION NUMBER 8 OF 2021. International Journal of Asia Pasific Collaboration, 2(2). Retrieved from http://ijapcollaboration.com/index.php/IJAPC/article/view/37